Final answer:
The assertion that the welfare and well-being of the community is the sole criterion of goodness in Akan moral philosophy is mostly true, as Akan morality and similar philosophies prioritize communal well-being over individual gains.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the sole criterion of goodness in Akan moral philosophy is the welfare and well-being of the community is largely True. Akan moral philosophy, particularly among the Asante chiefs, was fundamentally oriented toward using communal resources for the public good rather than private gain. This morality encapsulated a commitment to ensuring that actions and decisions benefited the broader community, aligning with the larger African philosophical context that often emphasizes communal values over individualism.
The welfare of the community is a pervasive theme across various historical and philosophical contexts, where the good of the community is often placed above personal desires. For instance, in Plato's vision of an ideal state, wisdom, discipline, and justice are virtues meant to serve the community's harmony and well-being. Similarly, Mohist ethical theory from ancient China stressed the importance of benevolence and care that contribute to social stability and the general welfare. However, it's crucial to understand that while Akan moral philosophy emphasizes communal well-being, it interacts with a broader framework of virtue ethics, where personal character and societal roles also play crucial roles in defining moral goodness.