Final answer:
The statement is false; Nel Noddings advocates for an ethic of care based on feelings and relationships, contrary to Kant's principle-based moral obligation approach.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that Nel Noddings agrees with Kant that caring for others must be based on a firm sense of moral obligation and not on feelings is False. Nel Noddings, in her approach to ethics known as the ethic of care, emphasizes that moral actions spring from feelings for others, especially within pivotal relationships. This view contrasts with Kant's deontological ethics, which are grounded in duty and rational principles rather than feelings. Noddings suggests that an ethic built on caring recognizes the significance of dependency relationships and the moral insight arising from the caring experience, which she argues have been traditionally feminine.
While Kant’s philosophy is focused on what all humans would find reasonable as a guide for human conduct, Noddings highlights how caring for individuals in our lives leads to an understanding of ethical behavior that is based on the context and relationships. This discrepancy marks a significant difference in their approaches, with Noddings advocating for a gendered, relational, and situationally sensitive paradigm for ethical decision-making.