Final answer:
Wollstonecraft's text objects to ethical subjectivism by asserting the universality of rationality, demonstrating her belief in objective moral reasoning and the importance of education for women to be recognized as rational beings.
Step-by-step explanation:
Wollstonecraft's article could be read as an objection to ethical subjectivism because rationality is universal. Mary Wollstonecraft, a pioneering feminist philosopher, asserts that women appear inferior to men only due to a lack of education, not because of any natural deficiency in rational capacity. Her argument that both men and women should be treated as rational beings inherently challenges ethical subjectivism, which posits that moral opinions are based on personal feelings rather than objective reasoning. By advocating for universal rationality, Wollstonecraft implies a level of objective moral reasoning that does not align with the individualistic perspective of ethical subjectivism.
The underlying message in Wollstonecraft's work emphasizes the importance of equitable education and its role in ensuring that women are recognized for their inherent worth and rational abilities. This stance is in opposition to the ethical subjectivist view that diminishes the role of universal principles in favor of individual sentiments in moral decision-making.