Final answer:
Marilyn Frye's article likely objects to cultural relativism by highlighting its shortcomings in accommodating minority criticisms within a culture and the need for a universal standard to challenge practices like female genital mutilation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Marilyn Frye's article could be read as an objection to cultural relativism. Cultural relativism posits the idea that moral values and ethics are relative to one's culture, suggesting that no universal moral standards can be imposed across different cultures. This notion implies that if a practice is accepted within a culture, it cannot be judged by outsiders, as there is no higher moral ground from which to do so. However, Frye, along with other critics like Nussbaum, challenge this concept as it fails to account for minority criticisms within a culture leading to moral reforms, as well as the ability to condemn practices such as female genital mutilation from an external standpoint. These objections point towards a need for a third alternative, one that acknowledges various cultural moral frameworks without being trapped in the paradox of absolute relativism.