231k views
1 vote
The risk of material misstatement changes the auditor's audit plan in order to attain the same amount of audit risk in the following ways except:

1) By increasing the extent of substantive procedures
2) By decreasing the extent of substantive procedures
3) By increasing the extent of tests of controls
4) By decreasing the extent of tests of controls

User Emschorsch
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

An auditor adjusts the audit plan in response to the risk of material misstatement by increasing substantive procedures and tests of controls. Decreasing substantive procedures is typically not a response to increased risk and thus, is the exception to how audit plans change to maintain audit risk.

"The correct option is approximately option 2"

Step-by-step explanation:

The question pertains to audit planning and how an auditor adjusts their audit plan in response to the assessed risk of material misstatement to maintain a consistent audit risk level. The risk of material misstatement (RMM) is the risk that there are material errors in the financial statements that the auditor will not detect. This is a key consideration in planning an audit.

When an auditor assesses a high risk of material misstatement:



Conversely, when an auditor assesses a lower risk of material misstatement:



To answer the question, the only option that is not a way the auditor's audit plan changes to maintain the same level of audit risk given a change in the risk of material misstatement is "2) By decreasing the extent of substantive procedures". A decrease in the extent of substantive procedures would generally be inconsistent with an increased risk of material misstatement.

User Fixedpoint
by
8.7k points