Final answer:
John and Bob's court case is a civil case, where John alleges a financial loss due to Bob's failure to pay for the racing bike and seeks compensation, and Bob claims it was a gift. The case hi_ges on the 'preponderance of the evidence,' and the jury must decide if Bob is liable or not liable.
Step-by-step explanation:
The case between John and Bob regarding the racing bike is a civil case. This type of legal dispute arises when one party, the plaintiff, claims to have incurred a loss at the hands of another party, the defendant, and seeks compensation or another form of legal remedy from a civil court. In this instance, John is alleging that Bob failed to pay for a racing bike, and Bob contends that it was a gift. Unlike criminal cases, where the defendant's liberty is at stake and must be proven guilty 'beyond a reasonable doubt,' civil cases require the plaintiff to prove their case based on a preponderance of the evidence.
The jury in a civil trial is tasked with deciding whether the defendant is liable or not liable for the plaintiff's claims. No criminal charges or penalties such as imprisonment are involved in civil litigation; it typically revolves around monetary compensation or the enforcement of certain actions.