Final answer:
The false statement about the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC) is that it has been judged to be very successful due to the increased cooperation it has fostered between NAFTA member nations in dealing with labor relations problems (statement A). The NAALC has been criticized for failing to meet expectations and not significantly altering corporate and government behavior.
Step-by-step explanation:
The North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC) was part of the labor side agreements of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). When assessing the statement about the NAALC, we find that statement A is false. The NAALC has often been criticized for not meeting its expectations to effectively improve labor relations problems. It's worth noting that NAFTA itself has been controversial, raising issues among environmentalists, labor unions, and the general American public about the potential for job loss and the weakening of protective legislation.
While the NAALC may have provided some education and research role (statement C) and there are 11 labor principles that it encompasses (statement E), the assertion that it has been 'very successful' (statement A) is contradicted by the continued labor issues, including the impact on jobs in the United States and labor exploitation concerns. In essence, corporate and government behavior has not dramatically transformed (statement D), and the NAALC has been viewed as not living up to the expectations set for it (statement B).
Furthermore, NAFTA's implications have been significant, leading to lost jobs in the U.S. and increased unemployment in Mexico, thereby driving illegal immigration due to a search for work. Although the goal was to help equalize standards of living across NAFTA countries, the actual results have been mixed and contentious.