Final answer:
The correct option that is NOT a criticism that organized labor in the United States levels at U.S. MNCs is e. Prohibition of the use of strikes. Organized labor criticizes U.S. MNCs for exporting U.S. technology to exploit low-cost foreign labor, depleting capital resources available for investment in the U.S. economy, substituting imports from their low-cost foreign operations for American-made goods, and displacing exports of American-made goods by producing cheaper goods for foreign markets using low-cost foreign labor.
Step-by-step explanation:
Organized labor in the United States criticizes U.S. MNCs for various reasons, such as exporting U.S. technology to exploit low-cost foreign labor, which deprives U.S. workers of the benefits of this technology (option a). They also criticize the foreign investments of U.S. MNCs, as these investments deplete capital resources available for investment in the U.S. economy (option b).
In addition, organized labor in the United States criticizes U.S. MNCs for substituting imports from their low-cost foreign operations for American-made goods (option c), and for displacing exports of American-made goods by producing cheaper goods for foreign markets using low-cost foreign labor (option d).
The criticism is generally focused on the impacts of globalization, such as the exportation of jobs, low wages in developing countries, and the undermining of U.S. workers' wages. However, the prohibition of strikes would be a labor policy issue, not a direct criticism of MNC activities relating to the exportation of technology or the competitive practices of MNCs.
The correct option that is NOT a criticism that organized labor in the United States levels at U.S. MNCs is e. Prohibition of the use of strikes.