Final answer:
Systematic reviews are identified as the most detailed type of EBP tool for planning client care because they provide a comprehensive analysis of all available studies pertaining to a specific research question.
Step-by-step explanation:
A group of students are reviewing various evidence-based practice (EBP) tools used for planning client care. Among the types listed, systematic reviews are generally recognized as the most detailed. Systematic reviews involve a comprehensive and structured approach to examining all available studies on a particular research question.
They assess the validity, findings, and implications of various research studies, including randomized controlled trials, to provide a high level of evidence. In contrast, research summaries provide brief overviews of research findings, clinical practice guidelines offer recommendations based on evidence but are not as detailed in their analysis of individual studies, and randomized controlled trials investigate the efficacy of interventions but focus on a specific question rather than a comprehensive overview.