150k views
4 votes
The Framers of the Constitution did not include a bill of rights because they thought it was unnecessary, believing that the document as originally written sufficiently protected civil liberties. Knowing what you know now, do you agree with the Framers of the Constitution, or do you agree with the Anti-Federalists who pushed for the Bill of Rights to be added? Justify your answer.

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The Framers of the Constitution originally did not include a Bill of Rights but the Anti-Federalists pushed for its addition. In hindsight, the addition of the Bill of Rights has proven to be crucial in protecting civil liberties and ensuring individual rights are upheld.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Framers of the Constitution originally did not include a Bill of Rights because they believed that the document as originally written sufficiently protected civil liberties. However, there were concerns raised by the Anti-Federalists who pushed for the Bill of Rights to be added.

The Anti-Federalists argued that a Bill of Rights was necessary to protect the people from the potential abuses of the new federal government. They believed that explicit protections for individual rights were essential to safeguarding the liberties of ordinary U.S. citizens.

In hindsight, the addition of the Bill of Rights has proven to be crucial in protecting civil liberties and ensuring individual rights are upheld, making it advisable to have included them from the start.

User Eli Stone
by
7.7k points