Final answer:
Treaties with Native Americans often involved land grants and terms for self-government, while scripts for the Métis were land certificates aiming to extinguish their land claims. The Dawes Act aimed at individual land allotments, which went against many tribes' communal practices, leading to resistance. These policies reflect the complexities of imperialistic goals and evolving federal policies towards indigenous groups.
Step-by-step explanation:
The treaties with Native Americans and the script given to the Métis were different in a few key aspects. While treaties often granted tribes land and laid out terms for self-government and resource rights, the script issued to the Métis were essentially certificates for land intended to extinguish Métis land claims, rather than establishing a permanent relationship that recognized their self-government. Also, the treaty provisions, which included annual stipends of basic provisions, made many tribes dependent on the government versus providing them with autonomy and control over their resources.
The policies were likely different due to the varying views and intentions of the government towards different indigenous groups. For the Métis, the government aimed to assimilate and absorb them into the dominant society, while treaties with Native American tribes sometimes came from a necessity to make peace, acquire lands, or fulfill legal obligations, albeit, often under unfair and coercive conditions.
The Dawes Act further complicated the situation by attempting to convert communal tribal lands into individual allotments to encourage farming practices contrary to many tribes' cultural norms. Various tribes resisted the Dawes Act by maintaining their communal ways, legal challenges, and in some cases, direct action to prevent the partitioning of their lands.
These policies were different because they stemmed from a complex mix of cultural misunderstandings, imperialistic objectives, and a fluctuating federal approach towards different indigenous groups, with treaties evolving over time. The Indian Act of 1876 and policies like the Inherent Right to Self-Government Policy continued to impact the administration of indigenous rights and the recognition of sovereignty.