Final answer:
Descriptions of phenomena without explanations are observational, and while correlation between variables may be noted, it does not establish causation. In science, explanations are preferred to be based on empirical evidence and mathematical models, and supernatural claims without evidence are generally not accepted.
Step-by-step explanation:
Descriptions of phenomena that detail occurrences without explaining the underlying causes can be thought of as observational data. These descriptions might track when a change in one variable coincides with a change in another, but this correlation does not imply causation. In science, explaining phenomena often involves constructing mathematical models or natural explanations based on empirical evidence. If phenomena are explained by appeals to the supernatural, the explanations lack physical evidence and do not provide an understanding of how non-physical entities could interact with the natural world. For instance, attributing an event to supernatural causes due to the absence of a current explanation is less preferred when there is no strong evidence supporting this claim and when the expectation of a naturalistic explanation is anticipated. Evidence is a key aspect of constructing explanations in science: without it, explanations, especially supernatural ones, are not substantiated.