Question

compare the tactics of the French troops from the French and Indian war to the American patriots in the revolutionary war

Answer 1

The French used guerrilla tactics and small-scale operations with their Native allies during the French and Indian War, while American patriots employed similar hit-and-run tactics and relied on militia forces along with crucial French support during the Revolutionary War.

Step-by-step explanation:

When comparing the tactics of the French troops during the French and Indian War to those of the American patriots in the Revolutionary War, a few differences and similarities can be highlighted.

The French, along with their Indian allies, often utilized guerrilla warfare tactics and attacked frontier towns, such as the incident in 1704 against Deerfield in western Massachusetts, to divert British attention away from Canada. The French tended to focus on small-scale operations and relied heavily on Native American allies, which allowed them to use the terrain to their advantage and employ surprise attacks. In contrast, the American patriots started the Revolutionary War without a professional army and relied on militia forces. They utilized hit-and-run tactics, avoided large-scale confrontations, and exploited local knowledge of the terrain. A major turning point for the Americans was the diplomatic alliance with France after the Battle of Saratoga, where French forces provided much-needed support, which was part of a broader strategy by the British to target North America as a primary field of engagement, as championed by William Pitt.

Answer 2

During the French and Indian War, French troops employed guerrilla tactics with Native American allies, while in the Revolutionary War, American patriots relied on militia forces, guerrilla tactics, and strategic alliances with the French to overcome the British.

Step-by-step explanation:

Comparison of French and American Revolutionary War Tactics

When comparing the tactics of the French troops in the French and Indian War to those of the American patriots in the Revolutionary War, it is clear that each side had differing strategies based on the context and their objectives. The French, during the French and Indian War, often allied with Native American tribes and utilized small-scale, guerrilla-style attacks aimed at frontier towns.

This was a tactical move to divert British colonists' attention away from Canada. Notable examples include the attack on Deerfield in 1704, led by French commanders and featuring mostly Indian soldiers. These surprise attacks in harsh conditions often resulted in the destruction of villages and the capture of settlers.

In contrast, the American patriots began the Revolutionary War without a professional army and relied heavily on militia forces. Their tactics evolved to include guerrilla warfare, hit-and-run tactics, and avoiding traditional pitched battles that favored the British's superior numbers and training.

The lack of a standing army meant that the colonists had to adopt more unconventional methods of warfare. Significantly, the alliance with France after the Battle of Saratoga provided the Americans with additional resources and an international dimension to the conflict, which was crucial for their victory.

Both conflicts involved acts of cruelty and harsh fighting conditions, particularly during winter. However, a key difference was the transition from a European-dominated conflict to a more localized American resistance. The American tactics, focused on survival and attrition, challenged the British ability to maintain control over the colonies and ultimately contributed to the Patriots' success in gaining independence.