Final answer:
OB scholars avoid general concept statements such as 'everyone wants an interesting job' because individual desires are influenced by varied situational conditions, and people's values and motivations differ(option 2).
Step-by-step explanation:
OB scholars avoid general concept statements such as 'everyone wants an interesting job' mainly because individual desires are contingent on situational conditions(option 2).
People have diverse sets of values, motivations, cultural backgrounds, and life circumstances which all influence what they want from their jobs. For instance, while some may prioritize job interest, others may place a higher value on job security, pay, work-life balance, or opportunities for advancement.
A functional perspective might view work as a system designed for efficiency, but this overlooks the individual differences and complexities within the workforce. Theories such as Davis-Moore thesis and Theory X and Theory Y by Douglas McGregor acknowledge the variability in motivation and attitude towards work. Theory X suggests that people inherently dislike work and must be directed or coerced into performing, while Theory Y posits that work can be as natural as play if conditions are favorable.
Different occupational roles and societal expectations further complicate the idea of what constitutes an 'interesting job.' For example, teachers may find their work noble and fulfilling despite relatively low pay, contrasting with the corporate world where financial incentives drive behavior. Universal generalizations fail to capture these nuances, and hence, OB scholars refrain from making broad, overreaching statements.