Final answer:
The Stomp and colleagues' study on Baltic Sea cyanobacteria found that one species uses short wavelengths of light efficiently, while the other uses longer wavelengths.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement supported by Stomp and colleagues' study of the partitioning of resources between two species of Baltic Sea cyanobacteria is: 3) One uses short wavelengths of light efficiently, while the other uses longer wavelengths.
In their study, Stomp and colleagues found that the two cyanobacteria species had different pigments that allowed them to efficiently use different wavelengths of light for photosynthesis. This led to a stratification of the microbial communities in the Baltic Sea based on light quality and penetration. One species was optimized for harvesting short wavelengths of light, while the other species was optimized for longer wavelengths.
The statement supported by Stomp and colleagues' study of the partitioning of resources between two species of Baltic Sea cyanobacteria is indeed: "One uses short wavelengths of light efficiently, while the other uses longer wavelengths." Stomp et al. demonstrated that the two cyanobacteria species exhibited distinct pigments, enabling them to efficiently utilize different wavelengths of light during photosynthesis. This discrepancy in light absorption strategies resulted in a stratification of microbial communities in the Baltic Sea, influenced by variations in light quality and penetration. Specifically, one cyanobacteria species demonstrated optimization for harvesting short wavelengths of light, while the other species was adapted for more efficient utilization of longer wavelengths. This research underscores the importance of resource partitioning and adaptation strategies among different species, contributing to the overall ecological dynamics of microbial communities in the Baltic Sea.