Final answer:
Without additional context, determining whether a designated quality reviewer has violated Volunteer Standards of Conduct cannot be definitively answered. It is essential to review the specified constitutional provisions and compare them to the reviewer's actions to make an accurate judgment.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question provided pertains to whether a designated quality reviewer has violated the Volunteer Standards of Conduct. Without additional context, a definitive answer cannot be provided. However, the referenced No. 12 Constitutional Revision concerning Article II, Section 8, Article V, Section 13, Article XII, New Section about lobbying and abuse of office by public officers suggests that the question is related to legal and ethical standards in a governmental or public service context. If the actions of the designated quality reviewer contravene these constitutional provisions or the explicit guidelines outlined in the Volunteer Standards of Conduct, then it would suggest a violation has occurred.
As it stands, to accurately answer if the reviewer violated the standards, one must have full knowledge of their actions in relation to the expected conduct as well as the particular rules or standards they are obliged to follow. It is crucial to review these guidelines and the reviewers' actions carefully to determine any potential breaches of conduct.