183k views
1 vote
How does a biologist typically assess confidence in a particular node of a phylogenetic tree?

1) Maximum likelihood
2) Bootstrapping or posterior probabilities
3) Bayesian Metropolis-Coupled Markov Chain Monte Carlo
4) Polytomy

User Kranach
by
7.0k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

Biologists typically assess confidence in a particular node of a phylogenetic tree using methods such as maximum likelihood, bootstrapping or posterior probabilities, and Bayesian Metropolis-Coupled Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). A polytomy is a node in a phylogenetic tree where the relationship between three or more taxa is unresolved.

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to assess confidence in a particular node of a phylogenetic tree, biologists typically use methods such as maximum likelihood, bootstrapping or posterior probabilities, and Bayesian Metropolis-Coupled Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC).



Maximum likelihood is a statistical method that calculates the most likely tree based on the observed data and a specific model of evolution. Bootstrapping or posterior probabilities involve creating multiple bootstrap replicates or running MCMC chains to estimate the support for each node. Higher support values indicate greater confidence in the node.



A polytomy is a node in a phylogenetic tree where the relationship between three or more taxa is unresolved. This can happen when there is insufficient data or conflicting data, and it indicates that more research is needed to determine the true relationship.

Biologists typically use bootstrapping or posterior probabilities to assess the confidence of a node in a phylogenetic tree, both of which provide a statistical measure of support.

To assess confidence in a particular node of a phylogenetic tree, biologists typically use methods like bootstrapping or posterior probabilities. These approaches help to determine how likely it is that the relationships depicted by the nodes are correct. Bootstrapping involves repeatedly resampling the data and reconstructing the tree to see how often the same relationships between species appear, which provides a measure of the strength of the data in supporting the tree. Posterior probabilities, usually derived from Bayesian analysis methods such as Bayesian Metropolis-Coupled Markov Chain Monte Carlo, give a direct measure of the probability of a node given the data and prior information. Both methods give biologists a statistical framework to evaluate the evolutionary history and speciation events represented in the tree.

User Simeon Abolarinwa
by
7.8k points