Final answer:
The provided statement 'less than 10' lacks context, making it impossible to determine its truthfulness without further information. Experiments can be conducted on humans if ethical standards are met, and larger sample sizes are generally preferred in scientific research.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question is asking to evaluate a statement, but it is presented without context or clarity, which makes it impossible to determine its truthfulness. Specifically, for a proper assessment, there needs to be a description of what the 'less than 10' refers to in the Cambridge Reports. Without this information, it's not feasible to state whether the claim is true or false. When analyzing survey results, like determining if a sample size is representative of a population, the details are crucial to providing an accurate conclusion. For example, a statement like 'Do you think that either of these samples is representative of (or is characteristic of) the entire 10,000 part-time student population?' depends on the size and selection method of the samples.
As for scientific experiments, the statement 'True or False. Experiments cannot be done on humans.' is false. Experiments can and are often done on human subjects, but they must adhere to strict ethical standards, including informed consent and minimizing potential harm. Furthermore, the statement 'True or False. Larger sample sizes are generally better than smaller ones in scientific experiments.' is true, as larger sample sizes typically provide more reliable and generalizable results.