Final answer:
The statement is False. While improvements in efficiency and sharing can help manage limited resources, they cannot fully counteract the limits imposed by finite resources and environmental constraints. There is a carrying capacity that can be reached, beyond which resources will fail to sustain the growing human population.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement you're asking about seems to refer to current discussions concerning resource allocation and the possibility of resource scarcity due to growth in human populations. The assertion that there is no 'bottleneck,' but just a limited capacity of resources and that people are improving at capacity sharing, is partially true. This is because while efficiency in using resources and better sharing can help manage limited resources, there are indeed natural limits to growth that can't be ignored. Factors such as carrying capacity, resource scarcity, and environmental constraints will eventually limit the ability of human societies to grow indefinitely.
Thus, the statement is true in recognizing that improvements in efficiency and sharing can help; however, it is false to suggest that these strategies alone can fully counteract the growth limits imposed by finite resources and environmental constraints. Resource scarcity implies that resources are inherently limited, and as the human population grows, the demand for these resources grows as well. Efficiency can only go so far before the absolute limits of carrying capacity are reached. Without sustainable practices and checks on growth, societal and environmental systems will likely face significant challenges.