Final answer:
The statement that extreme programming is ideal for developing large mission-critical applications is false. For such large-scale systems, methodologies with more rigorous planning and documentation, like Waterfall or SAFe, are better suited than XP.
Step-by-step explanation:
Regarding the statement, "Is extreme programming ideal for developing large mission-critical applications?" it is generally false. Extreme Programming (XP) is an agile methodology designed for small to medium-sized teams working on projects with vague or rapidly changing requirements. However, for large mission-critical systems, the informal nature and lack of comprehensive documentation inherent in XP may present significant risks. Such applications often require rigorous documentation, planning, and scalable architecture that can handle complex integration with other systems, which is not the primary focus of XP.
Instead, approaches like the Waterfall model or the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) might be more suitable for large, complex, and mission-critical systems. These methods provide a more structured environment and better support the careful planning and extensive documentation needed for these types of projects.