Final answer:
The question on whether Roggenbaum et al mentioned that family members were asked about home environment and access to weapons in the context of considering discharge for a client cannot be confirmed with the provided materials, which focus on housing, mental health, and stigma in community psychology.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that Roggenbaum et al found that client's family members were asked about their home environment, including access to weapons, which was used when considering discharge, does not correspond to the provided reference material. Instead, the provided references focus on the experiences of clients with housing, mental health, and the stigma associated with homelessness. They detail how evaluation and participatory approaches in community psychology can reveal important insights into the challenges faced by individuals transitioning from homelessness to housing.
The references discuss how the lived experiences of clients provide valuable perspectives that can lead to a more accurate understanding of the impact of housing on their wellbeing, the importance of social support, and the need for services that address complex issues such as trauma and stigma.