205k views
4 votes
Compared to non-directive interviews, structured interviews are likely to have _______ reliability and validity and _______ ability to break new ground or generate novel hypotheses?

1) Higher, Lower
2) Lower, Higher
3) Higher, Higher
4) Lower, Lower

User Cerno
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

Structured interviews have higher reliability and validity, but lower ability for novel hypothesis generation compared to non-directive interviews.

Step-by-step explanation:

Compared to non-directive interviews, structured interviews are likely to have higher reliability and validity due to the standardized nature of the questioning and rating system. This allows for consistent and comparable data across participants. However, because the questions and the format are predetermined and rigid, structured interviews have a lower ability to break new ground or generate novel hypotheses. This is because they do not allow for the open-ended, free-flowing conversation that might bring up unexpected insights or ideas, as unstructured interviews do.

User Robin Clowers
by
7.5k points