Question

List three sociological perspectives that address why societies distribute wealth, power, and prestige unequally, resulting in social stratification and social classes.

Answer 1

Sociologists explain social stratification through three perspectives: Functionalism, which argues it serves a purpose in society; Conflict theory, which sees it as a result of power struggles; and Symbolic interactionism, focusing on its impact on daily interactions.

Step-by-step explanation:

Sociological Perspectives on Social Stratification

Societies distribute wealth, power, and prestige unequally, which leads to social stratification and the formation of distinct social classes. Three major sociological perspectives help explain this phenomenon:

1. Functionalism: This view suggests that social stratification exists because it has beneficial consequences for the operation of society. The structural inequality is seen as a way to motivate individuals to fill different positions that require varying levels of skill and responsibility.
2. Conflict theory: This perspective sees social stratification as a result of conflict over resources and power. It posits that inequality arises from the domination of the wealthier classes over the poor and working classes. This theory emphasizes how the distribution of wealth and power is inherently unfair and results from the exploitation of the less privileged by those at the top.
3. Symbolic interactionism: From this micro-level perspective, social stratification influences day-to-day interactions and shapes people's understanding of social status. Symbolic interactionists examine how social standing is reflected in our actions and how the concept of 'social class' is created and maintained through these interactions.

By studying global stratification, sociologists can identify disparities in wealth, status, power, and economic stability between nations and understand how these global inequalities impact individual lives and social structures.