202k views
3 votes
Demand-side rationing means the:

1) demanding more health care
2) rationing the physician's hours
3) rationing the quantity and type of health services
4) demanding for more insurance coverage

User NickZeng
by
7.4k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The correct answer is option 3. Demand-side rationing means the rationing of the quantity and type of health services available to patients, which is reflected in option 3. This is a method to manage limited healthcare resources in systems like HMOs and is influenced by moral hazard and adverse selection in the insurance market.

Step-by-step explanation:

Demand-side rationing refers to the process by which the availability or access to health care services is restricted, not necessarily because of the lack of supply, but rather due to limitations on the demand side of the market. This can take place in health systems where decisions are made to limit the quantity and type of health services that patients can receive, rather than services being limited by how much can be supplied. Therefore, the correct option to answer the student's question is 3) rationing the quantity and type of health services.

In health maintenance organizations (HMOs), providers are reimbursed based on the number of patients they see, which can lead to a form of demand-side rationing, as providers must manage and allocate limited resources among their patient pool. Additionally, the concept of adverse selection in insurance markets indicates that individuals with higher health risks may be more inclined to take insurance at given premiums, while those with lower risks might opt out, further complicating the balancing act between demand and costs in the health care system.

The moral hazard issue arises because when people have comprehensive insurance coverage, they may be more inclined to use health care services excessively. This behavior is based on the principle that when the financial burden of service is removed or lessened, there's an incentive to use more of that service. The United States is cited as an example where high healthcare spending is not directly correlated to better health outcomes, suggesting inefficiencies in the system due to both moral hazard and demand-side pressures.

User Agamemnus
by
8.3k points