Final answer:
Tactics that involve physical contact or the use of chemical sprays or stunning weapons are typically seen in law enforcement and military contexts, and can also include self-defense measures. Chemical warfare employs various agents for offensive purposes, distinguishing lethal from incapacitating chemicals, and there are international protocols regulating their use. In contrast, physical contact for disciplinary purposes, such as corporal punishment, is differentiated from abuse based on the outcome of injury.
Step-by-step explanation:
The tactics that may involve physical contact or the use of chemical spray or stunning weapons are typically associated with law enforcement, military operations, or self-defense scenarios. Such tactics are employed to subdue, incapacitate, or deter an adversary or aggressor. For example, military police and security personnel are often exposed to pepper spray during their training to understand its effects and use it responsibly in the field. When discussing tactics involving the use of chemical substances, chemical warfare is a critical topic. It refers to the use of chemical substances as weapons to harm or incapacitate an enemy, and it includes a wide variety of agents, such as lethal and incapacitating chemicals. Furthermore, in the context of warfare and conflict, specific rules and protocols, such as the Geneva Protocol of 1925, prohibit the use of certain chemical weapons due to their destructive nature.
When discussing physical contact in discipline, it's important to distinguish between actions that constitute abuse from those that do not. Corporal Punishment like spanking is not considered abuse if it does not result in injury, according to standards set by organizations like the Child Welfare Information Gateway. In contrast, physical abuse in children involving harmful actions is recognized as abuse regardless of intent.