Final answer:
The 'true locality' rule would compare Dr. Samuel's actions to those of a physician in the exact same locality, considering local practices and resources.
Step-by-step explanation:
If the "true locality" rule were applied in Dr. Samuel's medical malpractice case, the court would judge his actions against the standard expected of a physician in the same exact locality as Dr. Samuel. This means the court would consider what is reasonably expected of a physician's actions within the geographical and socio-economic context of the community where the physician practices. This rule takes into account local medical practices and the resources that might be available to a physician in that area, opposed to a national standard which might not be reasonable for every local setting.