Final answer:
Constitutions are designed to limit the exercise of government power, an example being the U.S. Constitution. The statement about Pennsylvania's constitution during the Revolutionary Era being the most conservative is false. The claims that no state constitution allowed women to vote and the Constitutional Convention aimed to revise the Articles of Confederation are both true.
Step-by-step explanation:
Understanding the Role of Constitutions in Limiting Government Power
It is true that ideally, constitutions are designed to limit and control the exercise of authority by government. This is because a constitution typically outlines the fundamental laws and principles that define how a government operates, its structure, the limits of its powers, and the rights of the citizens. An example can be seen with the constitutional government of the United States, where the Constitution includes a necessary and proper clause. However, contrary to limiting, this clause has been interpreted to expand the power of the national government by allowing it to make laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution its powers.
Regarding the state constitutions during the Revolutionary Era, Pennsylvania adopted what was considered a radical constitution for its time, not a conservative one. Hence the statement that Pennsylvania adopted one of the most conservative constitutions is false.
Furthermore, during the Revolutionary Era, no state constitution granted the right to vote to women; this statement is true.
Additionally, the Constitutional Convention met in 1787 with the initial intent to revise the Articles of Confederation; however, it ended up creating a new constitution altogether, making this statement true.
Last but not least, the states chose to form republics during the Revolutionary War rather than monarchies or pure democracies, which is also true.