Final answer:
The author acknowledges the complex relationship between politics and project management, with an ideal scenario separating the two. However, the reality shows that politics often influence business decisions and project selection, making a complete separation challenging.
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the provided information, the author seems to acknowledge the intricacies and the inevitable intertwining of politics and project management within an organization. While the ideal scenario for the author appears to be a separation between politics and administration, this goal may not always be realistic in practice. Project management, which encompasses the implementation of the strategies determined to achieve objectives, can be influenced by political factors within the organization, such as the CEO's "pet idea." The literature suggests that political decisions can affect which projects are chosen and how resources are allocated, reflecting the broader definition of politics as who gets what, when, and how.
Therefore, given the context, the author seems to lean towards the first viewpoint, suggesting that while they acknowledge the influence of politics, they also see the value in striving for a separation between politics and project management to ensure that decisions are made in the best interest of the organization rather than individual preferences, even if achieving such separation may be challenging.