Final answer:
The statement that social science has more advanced measurement techniques than the natural sciences is false, as both fields use appropriate techniques suited to their research goals. Natural sciences rely on empirical data while social sciences account for the complexities of human behavior with various research methods.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that social science has more advanced measurement techniques than the natural sciences is False. Natural sciences, like physics, biology, and chemistry, use empirical methods to provide factual data. In contrast, social sciences, which include disciplines like sociology and psychology, often rely on qualitative assessments that are subject to the complexities and diversities of human behavior and social interactions. Both natural and social sciences have robust methodologies, yet the measure of 'advancement' might be subjective and context-dependent. While experiments in social science are challenged by human diversity, they do make use of methods like surveys, field research, and quantifiable data.
Regarding the ability to experiment on humans, it is False that experiments cannot be done on humans; rather, they must adhere to strict ethical standards. It is True that larger sample sizes are generally preferred in scientific research as they can provide more statistically significant results, reducing the influence of chance. This can often be seen in the utilization of P-values in statistical analyses to assert the significance of research findings.
In essence, while natural sciences are known for their empiricism, social sciences deal with more subjective and varied phenomena, requiring different but no less rigorous research methods. The process of scientific investigation, whether in social or natural sciences, is iterative, with correlation not necessarily implying causation, and with scientists communicating their findings to contribute to the broader knowledge base.