Final answer:
In a patient with pneumonia, poor quality documentation includes subjective and vague statements like 'difficulty breathing' and 'sounds produced when exhaling'. However, noting vital signs, specific breath sounds like rhonchi, and describing the quantity of sputum are examples of good documentation practice.
Step-by-step explanation:
In reviewing the nurse's documentation for a patient with pneumonia, certain statements can be considered as poor quality documentation and informatics. These include:
- The patient seems to have difficulty breathing. - This is subjective and lacks specificity. It would be more appropriate to describe the objective signs that contribute to this assessment, such as increased work of breathing, use of accessory muscles, or nasal flaring.
- Sounds are produced when exhaling. - This statement is vague and should be replaced with specific descriptions of the breath sounds heard through auscultation, such as wheezing, crackles, or rhonchi.
On the other hand, statements such as vital signs being provided, the specific description of rhonchi in the lower lung bases, and the note of copious amounts of sputum are examples of objective and high-quality documentation.