Final answer:
Negotiated Rulemaking is the procedure where a rulemaking committee discusses potential solutions and aims to reach a consensus on proposed rules before they are officially developed. It was established to improve the efficiency of bureaucratic processes and is included in the Negotiated Rulemaking Acts.
Step-by-step explanation:
The action that organized a rulemaking committee to discuss solutions and allow interested groups the chance to reach a consensus before an agency develops proposed rules is known as Negotiated Rulemaking.
This process involves convening a committee composed of those with vested interests in the rules being proposed. Neutral advisors, or convenors, are responsible for developing procedures to help the committee reach a consensus on these proposals.
With the assistance of neutral mediators, the goals are to streamline the rulemaking process, reduce adversarial disputes, and prevent lengthy litigation that has characterized the traditional notice-and-comment rulemaking system used by federal agencies.
Governments have recognized the benefits of this approach and included the negotiated rulemaking process in the Negotiated Rulemaking Acts of 1990 and 1996 to improve bureaucratic efficiency.
On occasion, when legislation demands the creation of new federal policies, regulations, or programs, the federal negotiated rulemaking procedure plays a crucial role in defining how these are to be implemented by the agencies.
This has become part of the oversight exercised over the bureaucracy by different branches of the government as well as citizens and whistleblowers within the institutions themselves.