Final answer:
The graph of a production possibility frontier shows the trade-off between environmental quality and economic output. Productive efficiency is represented by points on the frontier, while allocative efficiency is represented by points where the ratio of environmental quality to economic output is optimal. Choice T or R can be evaluated based on their trade-offs, and choice Q or S likely represents a command-and-control or market-oriented environmental policy.
Step-by-step explanation:
a. The graph of a production possibility frontier with environmental quality on the horizontal axis and economic output on the vertical axis would show the trade-off between environmental quality and economic output. As the number of trees (environmental quality) increases, the quantity of economic output (corn) decreases, and vice versa.
b. Choices that display productive efficiency would be those points on the production possibility frontier where the resources are fully utilized. In other words, any point on the frontier itself represents productive efficiency.
c. Choices that show allocative efficiency would be those points on the production possibility frontier where resources are allocated in a way that maximizes social welfare. In other words, any point on the frontier where the ratio of environmental quality to economic output is optimal represents allocative efficiency.
d. To decide which choice between T and R is better, you would need to evaluate the trade-off between environmental quality and economic output in each choice and determine which one aligns more with the desired objectives or preferences.
e. To determine which choice between T and S is better, you would need to evaluate the trade-off between environmental quality and economic output in each choice and determine which one aligns more with the desired objectives or preferences.
f. If choice Q represents stricter regulations and control over environmental policies, it is more likely to represent a command-and-control environmental policy. If choice S represents more market-oriented approaches and incentives, it is more likely to represent a market-oriented environmental policy.