Final answer:
Debtors in bankruptcy do not inherently have the power to sue investigators over false accusations without substantial legal grounds. The Panic of 1819 decreased, not increased, Americans' faith in the Second Bank. The necessary and proper clause has actually expanded the powers of the national government, and legal representation rights in the U.S. mandate that defendants have the right to a defense attorney.
Step-by-step explanation:
No, debtors in bankruptcy cases do not have the power to sue investigators over false accusations simply based on the accusation itself.
However, if a debtor in a bankruptcy case believes that they have been defamed or that their rights have been violated through malicious prosecution or similar legal grievances, they might be able to pursue legal action separate from the bankruptcy proceedings. This would be heavily dependent on the circumstances and whether the investigator's actions constitute a legal wrongdoing such as defamation.
The question of whether the Panic of 1819 increased the American people's faith in the Second Bank of the United States can be answered with 'b. False'. The text explicitly states that the crisis increased suspicion of financial institutions among the American people, indicating that faith in the Second Bank diminished rather than increased.
Regarding the necessary and proper clause, it has actually been used to expand the power of the national government rather than limit it. Therefore, the correct answer to the exercise query would be 'b. False'.
Legal representation rights in the United States have evolved over time, especially highlighted by the 1932 Scottsboro case. Since then, all defendants in federal courts, and eventually those in state courts, have the right to be represented by a defense attorney, even if it is a public defender provided by the state when they cannot afford one.