Question

Whether the methodology employed has been tested, whether the theory has been peer-reviewed, what the known or potential error rate of the method is, how well accepted the methodology is within the professional community, whether the expert's methodology existed before the subject litigation began.

a. Expert's credentials
b. Criteria for admissibility of expert testimony
c. Daubert standard
d. Scope of expert testimony

Answer 1

The criteria for admissibility of expert testimony in a legal context involves considering factors such as the expert's credentials, the acceptance of the methodology within the professional community, and whether the methodology has been tested and peer-reviewed.

Step-by-step explanation:

The subject of the question is the criteria for admissibility of expert testimony in a legal context. When determining the admissibility of expert testimony, several factors are considered, including the expert's credentials, the acceptance of the methodology within the professional community, and whether the methodology has been tested and peer-reviewed. Additionally, the known or potential error rate of the method and the existence of the expert's methodology before the litigation began are also important.