Final answer:
Upon a defendant's breach of a contract for the sale of goods, a A) plaintiff is typically entitled to specific performance when the goods are unique, such as works of art.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question is based on a legal principle concerning when a plaintiff is entitled to specific performance as a remedy upon a defendant's breach of a contract for the sale of goods. According to U.S. contract law, specific performance may be granted when the goods are unique, like works of art.
This means that the remedy of specific performance is not available as a matter of course and is not solely contingent on the defendant having "clean hands". While the inability to reasonably obtain cover might make specific performance more likely, the unique nature of the goods is the key factor for this remedy.
This legal concept supports building trust in a market where sellers might offer money-back guarantees to assure quality, especially important when the buyer cannot inspect the goods prior to purchase, such as in online or mail-order transactions.