111k views
0 votes
Convincing evidence with which to back a claim includes all of these except-

a. factual statments

b. strong opinion

c. statistics

d. expert testimony

2 Answers

1 vote

Final answer:

Factual statements, statistics, and expert testimony are considered strong, verifiable evidence for backing a claim, while a strong opinion is not, as it is subjective and cannot be empirically verified.

Step-by-step explanation:

Convincing evidence to back a claim includes several types of support, but not all are equally effective. Among the options provided, factual statements, statistics, and expert testimony are all forms of evidence that can be verified and are considered strong backing for an argument. However, strong opinion is not typically included as convincing evidence because, while it can provide a perspective or illustrate a belief, it cannot be verified in the same way as the other forms of evidence. Strong opinions are often subjective and not based on empirical data or expert analysis, which diminishes their credibility in an argument when compared to objective evidence.

User Joey Robert
by
7.8k points
3 votes

Final answer:

Convincing evidence for backing a claim includes factual statements, statistics, and expert testimony, but not strong opinions which are subjective and unverifiable. The correct option is:b. strong opinion

Step-by-step explanation:

Convincing evidence to back a claim includes a variety of reliable and verifiable forms of support such as factual statements, statistics, and expert testimony. These elements are crucial in creating a persuasive narrative or argument. In contrast, a strong opinion is not typically considered as convincing evidence because it is subjective and cannot be verified.

To effectively support a claim, one should prioritize evidence that is concrete and can be backed up with data or credible sources rather than relying solely on personal beliefs or viewpoints. The correct option is:b. strong opinion

User Jordi Castilla
by
8.0k points