Final answer:
Civil cases involve suits where the plaintiff must prove harm beyond a preponderance of evidence, which is a lower standard than the criminal standard of 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. The plaintiff's evidence must simply be more convincing than that of the defendant to win the case.
Step-by-step explanation:
Cases in which individuals, corporations, or the government bring suit against another party and must prove that a harm was done to them beyond a "preponderance of evidence" are A) Civil cases. In these cases, the plaintiff must present evidence that is more convincing than the defendant's evidence to the jury or judge. Unlike criminal cases which require proof "beyond a reasonable doubt", civil cases have a lower threshold for proving a case, which is a preponderance of evidence. This means that the evidence must weigh more in favor of the plaintiff's side to succeed in the lawsuit.
Furthermore, civil cases can be about various disputes including monetary damages or property. The Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial in civil cases involving disputes valued at twenty dollars or more, but often the stakes are much higher, and the choice to opt for a bench trial or jury trial can depend on factors such as the potential for significant damages.