Final answer:
The statement that a breach of a moral duty gives rise to civil liability is false. Legal obligations and civil liabilities are enforceable in a court of law; whereas moral obligations guide personal conduct and are not necessarily enforceable.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'A breach of a moral duty gives rise to civil liability' is false. Civil liability typically arises from a breach of legal duty, not necessarily a moral one. Although moral duties may influence the creation of legal obligations, a direct correlation between a moral duty and civil liability is not a legal standard.
Ross identified various prima facie duties such as duty of fidelity, duty of reparation, and duty of non-maleficence, but these primarily guide moral considerations rather than direct legal consequences. Civil law focuses on breaches of legal duties that can be adjudicated in civil court.
Understanding the difference between moral duties and legal obligations is a fundamental aspect of law and society which aligns with the concept of the social contract. This concept holds that individuals must accept certain moral and political obligations as members of society, but the breach of these moral obligations does not automatically lead to civil liability.