Final answer:
Educational agencies typically employ both qualitative and quantitative research, choosing based on what is most suitable for the context and objectives. Quantitative research is preferred for statistical analysis and pattern identification, while qualitative research is used to understand in-depth contexts and experiences.
Step-by-step explanation:
Agencies that manage educational policy and law are typically interested in both qualitative and quantitative research. However, the type of research they prioritize can vary depending on the context and objectives of the policy or law in question. Quantitative research is often employed in areas requiring statistical analysis, the measurement of outcomes, and the identification of patterns within large datasets. This approach is empirically driven and produces data that is easy to quantify and compare.
In contrast, qualitative research is more common when it's essential to understand contexts, experiences, or processes in depth. This type of research is particularly valuable for exploring complex issues where human behavior and perspectives are central, such as the implementation of educational programs or understanding the experiences of students under particular policies.
Ultimately, educational agencies might use a mixed-methods approach, combining both qualitative and quantitative data to gain a comprehensive understanding of the topics they are studying. Evaluation research, for instance, might employ surveys, interviews, and case studies to assess the effectiveness of educational initiatives, thereby incorporating both qualitative and quantitative elements.