Question

Why do some patient safety leaders such as Dr. David Bates believe the definition of harm should be broader than the definition in the IHI Global Trigger Tool?

a) To simplify reporting
b) To align with legal definitions
c) To capture more types of harm
d) To reduce accountability

Answer 1

Some patient safety leaders, like Dr. David Bates, believe that the definition of harm should be broader than the definition in the IHI Global Trigger Tool to capture more types of harm and align with legal definitions. It can also help reduce accountability.

Step-by-step explanation:

Some patient safety leaders, like Dr. David Bates, believe that the definition of harm should be broader than the definition in the IHI Global Trigger Tool for several reasons.

1. Firstly, by broadening the definition of harm, it can capture more types of harm that may not be included in the existing tool. This ensures that all potential harm incidents are accounted for and can be addressed.
2. Secondly, a broader definition of harm aligns with legal definitions of harm, which is important in terms of reporting and accountability.
3. Lastly, a broader definition can help to reduce accountability by identifying potential areas of improvement and addressing them before they result in significant harm.