216k views
4 votes
More students should be required to vo

puff football game that raises money for Children's Hospital. Last year,
the event raised over $5,000 for the hospital - mainly through ticket
sales and raffles
Argument 2:
More students should be required to volunteer at the annual powder-
puff football game that raises money for Children's Hospital. Research
has shown that students who volunteer have more of a connection to
their community
Which argument is supported by relevant evidence, and how?
A. Argument 1, because the example supports the claim that
students should be required to volunteer at the event
OB. Argument 1, because the example supports the claim that the
event raises a lot of money for the hospital
O c. Argument 2, because the example supports the claim that
students should be required to volunteer at the event
D. Argument 2, because the example supports the claim that the
event raises a lot of money for the hospital

User Carl Owens
by
3.6k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Answer:

B. Argument 1, because the example supports the claim that the event raises a lot of money for the hospital

Step-by-step explanation:

Argument 1 is in favor of the mandatory participation of students to participate in the charity game that aims to raise money for the Children's Hospital. This argument presents evidence that justifies the reason why this statement was issued. This is because they show that the more students the more money will be raised. This can be seen in the lines "Last year, the event raised over $ 5,000 for the hospital - mainly through ticket sales and raffles."

User MiDri
by
3.4k points