Question

Which of these factors are essentially complete opposites from an intensity perspective across the project life cycle?

A) Risk and Resource Allocation
B) Uncertainty and Project Stake.
C) Scope Creep and Quality Assurance
D) Schedule and Cost Overruns

Answer 1

From the perspective of the project life cycle, Risk and Resource Allocation exhibit an inverse relationship in intensity, with risk starting high and decreasing, and resource allocation starting low and increasing as the project progresses.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question relates to the project management field, specifically to the dynamics of various factors throughout the project life cycle. When we examine the options provided, we can see that Risk and Resource Allocation are two factors that tend to have an inverse relationship across the project life cycle. At the start of a project, risk is typically higher because many outcomes are uncertain, but as the project progresses, risk generally decreases due to more information and better understanding. Contrastingly, resource allocation is typically lower at the start when the project is being planned, and then it increases as the project moves into the execution phase.

Let's look at the other options. Uncertainty and Project Stake do not inherently have an opposite intensity perspective; they are not mutually exclusive. Scope Creep and Quality Assurance are concerns to be managed, not necessarily opposites in intensity. Lastly, Schedule and Cost Overruns are both negative circumstances that can happen concurrently and do not represent opposing forces in terms of intensity.