Question

Annie drove through an intersection without looking and hit Lana's car. The jury found that Annie's fault contributed 20% of the total $100,000. Under the doctrine of comparative negligence, the jury would award Annie:

a. Nothing
b. $20,000
c. $80,000
d. $100,000

Answer 1

Under comparative negligence, Annie would receive $80,000, which is 80% of the total damages, after her 20% fault is subtracted from the total award of $100,000.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question involves the legal concept of comparative negligence, which is used to determine the amount of damages a plaintiff can recover in a negligence case. Comparative negligence apportions fault among the parties involved. In the scenario provided, Annie contributed 20% to the fault of an accident with a total damage of $100,000. Under a pure comparative negligence system, Annie would still be able to recover damages, but her award would be reduced by her percentage of fault. Therefore, the correct answer would be she would receive $80,000 because her award is reduced by 20% (her contribution to the fault), which equals $20,000. So, Annie would be awarded the remaining 80% of the total damages.