Final answer:
The statement about Paralympic athletes being unable to use technology is false; Paralympic athletes may use approved assistive technologies during competition. Additionally, no state constitution in the Revolutionary Era allowed women to vote, which is true, and the claim that many women were incapable of handling the burdens of war is generally false as they took on various roles.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that athletes who take part in the Paralympic Games cannot use technology to assist them in their sport is false. Paralympic athletes can, and often do, use technology specifically designed to assist them in competition. This technology can take many forms, from prosthesis for runners to specially designed wheelchairs for wheelchair basketball players. Much like technology in the Olympics, the technology used in the Paralympics must meet certain criteria and be approved by the governing bodies of the respective sports.
The information provided in the exercises implies that this is a question on voting rights and the role of women during the Revolutionary Era, rather than on the Paralympics or technology. For example, Exercise 9.1.4 states that no state constitution in the Revolutionary Era allowed women the right to vote, which is true. Meanwhile, Exercise 8.3.2 suggests that many women found themselves incapable of handling the burdens of war, which is a broad statement that could be considered false as many women were indeed capable and took on various roles during the war.
In terms of physics, the statement in the Check Your Understanding section that the efficiency of a simple machine is always less than 100 percent due to some work being converted to heat energy because of friction is true.