Final answer:
Without seeing the actual political cartoon, we cannot definitively select an option; however, the context provided suggests it may address labor reforms such as work conditions or labor laws. Unions supported these reforms, which paradoxically reduced their perceived necessity. Protectionism also impacted low-wage workers beyond the workplace.
Step-by-step explanation:
The political cartoon addresses a particular progressive issue, which is likely related to labor rights and reforms in the early 20th century. Without the ability to see the political cartoon, it's impossible to definitively choose an answer between options a) low wages for workers, b) unsafe working conditions, c) the need for child labor laws, and d) affordable housing for workers. However, given the reference provided, it seems the political cartoon might relate to the general area of labor reforms and worker protections, likely drawing attention to advocacy for better working conditions or support for labor laws.
Citizens have historically called upon elected representatives to create labor laws concerning work conditions, overtime, parental leave, and pension regulations. Strong political support from unions has played a significant role in securing these protections, which ironically led to a decline in union membership as workers began to feel these laws made unions less crucial.
Furthermore, the provided context also illuminates the struggles of low-wage workers with protectionism affecting industries such as food and clothing, resulting in higher costs for basic necessities and a reduced purchasing power for these workers. This adds another dimension to the progressive issues being tackled at the time.