Final answer:
The severity of discrimination against 'jocks' compared to other kinds of discrimination is not simple to measure due to the subjective and context-dependent nature of discrimination experiences. While not typically scrutinized at the same level legally as discrimination based on race or gender, any discrimination is harmful and should be addressed.
Step-by-step explanation:
Discrimination can come in many forms and affects individuals and groups to different degrees, depending on the social, historical, and legal context of each form. Types of discrimination include those based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, religion, and other personal characteristics. In American history, laws such as Jim Crow exemplified overt and institutional racial discrimination, while discriminatory hiring practices illustrate more individualized forms of prejudice.
When considering discrimination against 'jocks' or athletes, it may not typically be subjected to the same stringent legal scrutiny as discrimination based on protected characteristics like race or gender. Society and the legal system often perceive discrimination against 'jocks' as less severe when compared to the deep-seated and pervasive nature of other kinds of discrimination that have historically marginalized groups or denied them equal rights and opportunities. Nonetheless, it is important to acknowledge that any form of discrimination can be damaging to the individuals affected by it.
To answer the question, there is no definitive measure of severity that can be uniformly applied as experiences of discrimination are subjective and context-dependent. Instead, one should understand the complexities involved in comparing different kinds of discrimination and recognize that all forms of discrimination are harmful and should be addressed