Final answer:
Candide's agreement to Vanderdendur's prices may not be entirely wise, considering the potential for exploitation. His lack of danger perception could be due to inexperience or a belief that people do not intentionally do wrong, as per Socratic philosophy.
Step-by-step explanation:
Evaluation of Candide's Decision
Assessing whether it is wise for Candide to agree to Vanderdendur's prices requires understanding the context in which Candide operates. Fundamentally, the wisdom of his decision is nuanced and dependent on moral and practical considerations. The passage provided suggests that Candide, despite the unclear nature of the bargain, is willing to transact with someone he may not entirely trust in order to achieve a specific end. His failure to perceive danger could be attributed to his desperation or perhaps a lack of worldly experience that would otherwise make him more cautious.
Comprehending the Choices Faced
The conundrum Candide faces is similar to the ethical dilemma reflected in the second passage. Would one accept help from a person of 'abominable vices' if it were crucial to their survival? The answer to this lies within the individual's moral compass and the harsh realities they might be facing. Similarly, Candide's decision to comply with Vanderdendur may not be 'wise' in every sense, but it could be considered pragmatic in the moment, weighing immediate survival against potential moral compromises.
Rationale Behind Actions
Candide might not see the danger in his actions because of either innocence, ignorance, or idealism, reflecting Socratic beliefs that wrongdoing is a result of not knowing any better. People, according to Socrates, do not voluntarily choose evil; they mistake it for the good. Thus, Candide's lack of suspicion could be seen as a lack of understanding of what is truly good or safe, rather than a deliberate oversight.