Final answer:
The speaker likely appreciates old cities for their charm and acknowledges the technological advancements in new cities. Historical context from the City Beautiful movement suggests a balanced view, valuing both aesthetics and modernization. Emotional connections residents have with their cities also indicate a nuanced perspective.
Step-by-step explanation:
The speaker's view of new and old cities is not explicitly favoring one over the other. Instead, the speaker appears to appreciate different aspects of each. From the information provided, which includes perspectives on the City Beautiful movement and the cultural and social dynamics of 19th-century urban life, it can be inferred that the speaker is likely to appreciate the charm of old cities while acknowledging advancements in new cities (option c). This is supported by the historical context of the City Beautiful movement, which sought to address the drawbacks of urban sprawl by creating green spaces and improving the aesthetics of cities, benefiting all citizens but particularly the middle and upper classes. However, people in these times also developed deep emotional connections to their cities, demonstrating an appreciation for both the historical and the modern aspects of their urban environments.