80.5k views
1 vote
If a lease has no provision regarding assignment, but the lessee assigns the lease, which of the following is true?

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

The lease can typically be assigned if there is no provision preventing it, but the original lessee remains liable unless the landlord agrees otherwise. Termination clauses often require a 30-day notice and proper vacating of the premises to avoid additional liabilities.

Step-by-step explanation:

If a lease has no specific provision regarding assignment, it typically means that the lease may be assigned without the landlord's consent. However, state or local law might impose certain restrictions or obligations, so it's critical to review any applicable regulations. Without explicit prohibition, assignments are generally assumed to be allowed, but the lessee remains liable for the lease obligations unless the landlord agrees to release the lessee. Therefore, if the lessee assigns the lease, they should ensure that the assignee is capable of adhering to the lease terms to prevent potential legal issues.

Many leases and rental agreements will include a termination clause, outlining the conditions under which the agreement can be ended. This could include a requirement for a 30-day written notice or the need to specify 'just cause' when applicable laws mandate it. When a lessee moves out, they must remove all their possessions and return keys and other provided items. Failing to properly vacate the premises could result in the lessee being liable for additional rent and damages, which might include the landlord's loss of rent due to being unable to lease to a new renter. Therefore, even though assigning a lease might be initially permissible, the original lessee could face significant consequences if not handled appropriately.

User Scroobius
by
7.6k points