Final answer:
An oral rental agreement for 3 years violates the Statute of Frauds because it must be in writing to be enforceable, as it cannot be completed within one year. The example provided revises contract language for clarity in accordance with the Plain Writing Act of 2010.
Step-by-step explanation:
The example that violates the Statute of Frauds is an oral rental agreement for 3 years. The Statute of Frauds requires that certain types of contracts be in writing to be enforceable. These typically include contracts for the sale of land, contracts that cannot be performed within one year, and long-term leases over one year. Since an oral rental agreement for three years cannot be completed within one year, it must be in writing to be enforceable under the statute.
Now, in the context of simplifying contract language under the Plain Writing Act of 2010, a section of a rental agreement could be rewritten for clarity as follows:
Termination: This lease renews monthly after the initial lease term ends. Either the landlord or the tenant can end the lease with a 30-day written notice. For the lease to end, the tenant must remove all of their belongings, including from storage, and return all keys and items provided by the landlord. If the tenant does not leave by the agreed date, or leaves belongings behind, they must pay extra rent and may owe other costs, especially if the landlord loses out on renting to someone else.